Internet broadcasting fees as a brake on innovation
Summary
In 1997, ideas of charging broadcasting fees for internet-capable PCs met with fierce opposition. The industry association for information technology threatened to sue, and research minister Rüttgers spoke of a brake on innovation: a company with 1,000 PCs would have had to pay almost 30,000 marks a month. The fee collection agency GEZ admitted that the state treaty had not foreseen the technology and waived fees for the time being.
Ideas
- The state treaty defined every device that can reproduce broadcasts without a time delay as a receiver.
- This formally made internet-capable PCs liable for the fee as well.
- The IT industry argued that internet transmissions were asynchronous and not broadcasting.
- A new regulation needed the approval of all German states.
Insights
- Technology-neutral legal wording often covers devices nobody had thought of.
- Fee models per device fit poorly with workplaces with many computers.
Facts
- Under the rules of the time, a company with 1,000 computers would have paid almost 30,000 marks a month.
- The GEZ did not want to charge fees for internet PCs until a workable regulation was in place.
References
Critique
- The report mainly reflects the industry’s view; the arguments of the broadcasters hardly appear.
Remarks
- The fee for “new types of broadcast receivers” came in 2007; since 2013 a device-independent broadcasting contribution per household and business premises has applied.
Recommendations
- With new classes of devices, check early which existing levies or obligations they could trigger.
- Take part in consultations when rules are being made for technology you operate.
Links to the original source and the Web Archive open in a new tab.